AI writing · 2026
Best AI writing tools for Bluesky 5 tools ranked by verified data
Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify
We scored 6 AI writing tools for Bluesky with the same 7-criterion scorecard; 5 have enough verified data to be ranked.
Only tools with verified Bluesky support are included.
Typefully ranks first with 98/100, followed by AdaptlyPost (78) and Quuu (70).
The lowest starting price among ranked tools (the least you can pay for a paid plan, for one user or account) is AdaptlyPost's: $19 per month billed monthly on the Creator plan.
The ranking
| # | Tool | Score | Coverage | From, billed monthly | From, billed yearly | Free plan | Public API | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Typefully | 98/100 | 75%5 of 7 criteria | Free | Free | Yes, 1 user | Yes | Oct 14, 2026 |
| 2 |  AdaptlyPost | 78/100 | 90%6 of 7 criteria | $19/mo | Not offered | No | Yes | Oct 14, 2026 |
| 3 |  Quuu | 70/100 | 65%4 of 7 criteria | $19.79/account/mo | $16.49/account/mo | No | – | Oct 14, 2026 |
| 4 |  SuperX | 65/100 | 75%5 of 7 criteria | $49/mo | Not offered | No | Yes | Oct 14, 2026 |
| 5 |  Aidelly | 54/100 | 90%6 of 7 criteria | Not offered | $29/mo | No | Yes | Oct 14, 2026 |
| – |  Postezi | Not ranked | 25%2 of 7 criteria | Not offered | Not offered | No | – | Oct 14, 2026 |
Each value links the vendor page it was read from (hover for the check date). Coverage is the share of the scorecard's weight with verified data, and "N of M criteria" how many criteria the score is based on; a tool is ranked at 60% or more.
– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.
Why each one ranks where it does
- 1. Typefully 98/100
Collaborative social media scheduler and writing editor for X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads and Mastodon, with AI writing help, a calendar and analytics.
- Entry price (100/100): Free: the pricing page lists no paid plan
- Free plan or trial (100/100): Free plan (Free)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026 - 2. AdaptlyPost 78/100
Social media scheduler that publishes to many platforms from a dashboard or AI agents, with a calendar, AI captions, image generation and analytics.
- Cost per user (team of 3) (100/100): $13 per user per month on Pro (team of 3, billed monthly)
- API, integrations and export (100/100): public API
From $19 per month billed monthly on the Creator plan.
- 3. Quuu 70/100
AI social media agent that learns a user's brand voice, generates posts and images, and schedules them to X, LinkedIn, Facebook and Bluesky.
- Pricing transparency (87/100): 1 of 1 plans have a public price
- Verified features (75/100): 3 of 8 tracked features verified: analytics, ai assistant, brand voice
From $19.79 per social account per month billed monthly ($16.49 billed yearly) on the Everything included plan.
- 4. SuperX 65/100
Platform for growing on X that offers AI post and thread writing, scheduling, engagement tools, automations and analytics, plus a Chrome extension.
- Verified features (100/100): 4 of 8 tracked features verified: analytics, ai assistant, brand voice, browser extension
- Pricing transparency (100/100): 3 of 3 plans have a public price
From $49 per month billed monthly on the Pro plan.
- 5. Aidelly 54/100
White-label social media platform for agencies where AI agents draft, schedule and report on client content with team approvals.
- Pricing transparency (100/100): 3 of 3 plans have a public price
- API, integrations and export (100/100): public API
From $29 per month billed yearly on the Launch plan.
How we picked
Every one of these AI writing tools is scored by the same 7 criteria (scorecard v1). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to AI writing tools. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.
| Criterion | Weight | Type | What we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | Core | Price per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other AI writing tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $9.99/month or less = 100, $69 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $4.92/month or less = 100, $49 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored. |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | Core | Whether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored. |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | Core | How much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored. |
| Verified features | 15% | Core | How many of the 8 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant, brand voice, seo optimisation, plagiarism checker, browser extension). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 4 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored. |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | Core | Whether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored. |
| Cost per user (team of 3) | 15% | Category | Monthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Log scale: $13 per user or less = 100, $69 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored. |
| Languages | 10% | Category | Number of languages the vendor says it offers.Linear scale: 100 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored. |
Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.
Questions, answered from the data
What is the best AI writing tool for Bluesky?
Typefully, with 98/100 on our scorecard; AdaptlyPost is second with 78/100.
What is the cheapest AI writing tool for Bluesky?
By entry price among ranked tools, AdaptlyPost: $19 per month billed monthly on the Creator plan.
Which of these have a free plan?
1 of the 6 tools has a free plan; the highest-ranked is Typefully.
How did you rank these AI writing tools?
Each tool gets 0 to 100 per criterion from its published pricing, limits and features; the total is the weighted average over the criteria with verified data. Tools with under 60% of the weight covered are not ranked.