Social media scheduling
Antwork vs Buffer compared on 17 fields
- Antwork score
- 89/100 (6 of 8 criteria)
- Buffer score
- 98/100 (6 of 8 criteria)
- Fields won by Antwork
- 0 of 9
- Fields won by Buffer
- 2 of 9
Antwork
Buffer
Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify
Antwork and Buffer are both social media scheduling tools. We compared them on 17 fields read from each vendor's own pages.
On the social media scheduling tools scorecard Antwork scores 89/100 (6 of 8 criteria) and Buffer 98/100 (6 of 8 criteria) (ranks 8 and 1 in the category).
Of the 9 fields with a clear rule (lower price, higher count, yes over no), Antwork wins 0, Buffer wins 2 and 7 are ties.
Buffer scores clearly higher on verified features and free plan limits.
Side by side
| Field | Antwork | Buffer | Winner and basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheapest paid plan (billed monthly) | $5/month | $5/month | Tie |
| Same plan, per month billed annually | – | $5/month | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Free trial | No | ✓ Yes | Buffer |
| Trial length (days) | – | 14 | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Accounts on the free plan | 2 | ✓ 3 | Buffer |
| Public API | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Posting queue | – | Yes | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Calendar view | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| First-comment scheduling | – | Yes | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Direct auto-publishing | Yes | – | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| AI caption assistant | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Post and account analytics | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Approval workflows | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| User roles and permissions | – | Yes | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Unified social inbox | – | Yes | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Content repurposing | – | Yes | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.
Sources: Antwork pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026; Buffer pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026. Each feature value links its own source on the tool's page.
Scorecard, criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Weight | Antwork | Buffer |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | 100$5/month per account billed monthly on Per account (scored on the monthly price) | 100$5/month per account billed annually on Essentials; no monthly-billed price published (scored against annual-billed prices) |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | 100Free plan (Free) | 100Free plan (Free) |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 932 of 2 plans have a public price | 1003 of 3 plans have a public price |
| Verified features | 15% | 505 of 19 tracked features verified: calendar view, direct auto-publishing, ai caption assistant, post and account analytics, approval workflows | 909 of 19 tracked features verified: posting queue, calendar view, first-comment scheduling, ai caption assistant, post and account analytics, approval workflows, user roles and permissions, unified social inbox, content repurposing |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | 100public API | 100public API |
| Free plan limits | 5% | 84Free plan: 2 connected accounts, unlimited scheduled posts per month | 100Free plan: 3 connected accounts |
| Total score | 100% | 89/100 (6 of 8 criteria) | 98/100 (6 of 8 criteria) |
Antwork plans
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed yearly | Charged per | Published limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free | per social account |
|
| Per account | $5 | Not stated | per social account |
|
Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.
Buffer plans
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed yearly | Charged per | Published limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free | per social account |
|
| Essentials | Not offered | $5 | per social account |
|
| Team | Not offered | $10 | per social account |
|
Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.
How we picked
Every one of these social media scheduling tools is scored by the same 8 criteria (scorecard v2). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to social media scheduling tools. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.
| Criterion | Weight | Type | What we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | Core | Price per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other social media scheduling tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $9/month or less = 100, $49 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $9/month or less = 100, $58 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored. |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | Core | Whether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored. |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | Core | How much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored. |
| Verified features | 15% | Core | How many of the 19 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (posting queue, bulk scheduling (csv or multi-post), calendar view, first-comment scheduling, direct auto-publishing, recurring posts, media library, ai caption assistant, post and account analytics, report exports (pdf/csv), best-time-to-post suggestions, approval workflows, user roles and permissions, separate client workspaces, unified social inbox, white-label reports, link tracking (utm / short links), content repurposing, ugc collection). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 10 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored. |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | Core | Whether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored. |
| Platform coverage | 10% | Category | How many of the 15 social platforms we track the vendor says the tool supports.Linear: platforms / 10 x 100, capped at 100. No verified platform list = not scored. |
| Cost per connected account | 10% | Category | Monthly price per connected account on the cheapest paid plan that allows at least 3 social accounts.Log scale: $2 per account or less = 100, $40 or more = 0. Plans that do not state an account limit are not used. |
| Free plan limits | 5% | Category | What the free plan allows: connected accounts (full marks at 3), scheduled posts per month (full marks at 100).Each stated limit linear up to its full mark (unlimited = 100), averaged. Tools without a free plan, or whose free plan states none of these limits, are not scored here. |
Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.
Questions, answered from the data
Is Antwork cheaper than Buffer?
Their cheapest paid plans cost the same, $5 a month.
Do Antwork and Buffer have free plans?
Both have a free plan.
Which is better, Antwork or Buffer?
On our scorecard Buffer scores higher (98/100 (6 of 8 criteria) vs 89/100 (6 of 8 criteria)). The score weighs every criterion the same way for every tool; check the rows above for the ones that matter to you.