AI writing

AutoBlogWriter vs LinkGenie compared on 11 fields

AutoBlogWriter score
72/100 (4 of 7 criteria)
LinkGenie score
87/100 (4 of 7 criteria)
Fields won by AutoBlogWriter
2 of 6
Fields won by LinkGenie
1 of 6
AutoBlogWriter
AutoBlogWriter homepage (screenshot)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026
LinkGenie
LinkGenie homepage (screenshot)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026

Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify

AutoBlogWriter and LinkGenie are both AI writing tools. We compared them on 11 fields read from each vendor's own pages.

On the AI writing tools scorecard AutoBlogWriter scores 72/100 (4 of 7 criteria) and LinkGenie 87/100 (4 of 7 criteria) (ranks 26 and 11 in the category).

Of the 6 fields with a clear rule (lower price, higher count, yes over no), AutoBlogWriter wins 2, LinkGenie wins 1 and 3 are ties.

LinkGenie scores clearly higher on free plan or trial and verified features.

Side by side

A winner is declared only on rows with a clear rule and data on both sides.
AutoBlogWriter vs LinkGenie, field by field
FieldAutoBlogWriterLinkGenieWinner and basis
Cheapest paid plan (billed monthly)$19/month$19/monthTie
Same plan, per month billed annually✓ $14/month$15.20/monthAutoBlogWriter
Free planNo✓ YesLinkGenie
Free trial✓ YesNoAutoBlogWriter
Trial length (days)3–No winner: needs a value on both sides
Platforms supported–1No winner: needs a value on both sides
AnalyticsYesYesTie
AI assistant–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Brand voiceYesYesTie
SEO optimisationYes–No winner: needs a value on both sides
Browser extension–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides

– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.

Sources: AutoBlogWriter pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026; LinkGenie pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026. Each feature value links its own source on the tool's page.

Scorecard, criterion by criterion

Both tools on the AI writing tools scorecard: score 0-100 and the numbers it was computed from.
AutoBlogWriter vs LinkGenie scores
CriterionWeightAutoBlogWriterLinkGenie
Entry price25%67$19/month billed monthly on Starter; $14/month billed annually on Starter (scored on the monthly price)67$19/month billed monthly on Starter; $15.20/month billed annually on Starter (scored on the monthly price)
Free plan or trial15%60Free trial (3 days), no free plan100Free plan (Free)
Pricing transparency10%1003 of 3 plans have a public price1004 of 4 plans have a public price
Verified features15%753 of 8 tracked features verified: analytics, brand voice, seo optimisation1004 of 8 tracked features verified: analytics, ai assistant, brand voice, browser extension
Total score100%72/100 (4 of 7 criteria)87/100 (4 of 7 criteria)

AutoBlogWriter plans

AutoBlogWriter plans
PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyCharged perPublished limits
Starter$19$14per workspace
  • 10 images per month
  • 1 workspace
Growth$49$37per workspace
  • 50 images per month
  • 3 workspaces
Scale$149$119per workspace
  • 400 images per month
  • 10 workspaces

Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.

AutoBlogWriter pricing in full

LinkGenie plans

LinkGenie plans
PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyCharged perPublished limits
FreeNot statedFreeNot statedNone stated
Starter$19$15.20Not statedNone stated
Pro$26$20.80Not statedNone stated
Premium$36$28.80Not statedNone stated

Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.

LinkGenie pricing in full

How we picked

Every one of these AI writing tools is scored by the same 7 criteria (scorecard v1). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to AI writing tools. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.

Scorecard criteria and weights
CriterionWeightTypeWhat we measure
Entry price25%CorePrice per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other AI writing tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $9.99/month or less = 100, $69 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $4.92/month or less = 100, $49 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored.
Free plan or trial15%CoreWhether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored.
Pricing transparency10%CoreHow much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored.
Verified features15%CoreHow many of the 8 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant, brand voice, seo optimisation, plagiarism checker, browser extension). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 4 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored.
API, integrations and export10%CoreWhether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored.
Cost per user (team of 3)15%CategoryMonthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Log scale: $13 per user or less = 100, $69 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored.
Languages10%CategoryNumber of languages the vendor says it offers.Linear scale: 100 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored.

Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.

Questions, answered from the data

Is AutoBlogWriter cheaper than LinkGenie?

Their cheapest paid plans cost the same, $19 a month.

Do AutoBlogWriter and LinkGenie have free plans?

LinkGenie has a free plan; AutoBlogWriter does not.

Which is better, AutoBlogWriter or LinkGenie?

On our scorecard LinkGenie scores higher (87/100 (4 of 7 criteria) vs 72/100 (4 of 7 criteria)). The score weighs every criterion the same way for every tool; check the rows above for the ones that matter to you.