Graphic design

Pika vs Visme compared on 11 fields

Pika score
79/100 (6 of 7 criteria)
Visme score
83/100 (6 of 7 criteria)
Fields won by Pika
2 of 6
Fields won by Visme
0 of 6
Pika
Pika homepage (screenshot)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026
Visme
Visme homepage (screenshot)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026

Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify

Pika and Visme are both graphic design tools. We compared them on 11 fields read from each vendor's own pages.

On the graphic design tools scorecard Pika scores 79/100 (6 of 7 criteria) and Visme 83/100 (6 of 7 criteria) (ranks 6 and 4 in the category).

Of the 6 fields with a clear rule (lower price, higher count, yes over no), Pika wins 2, Visme wins 0 and 4 are ties.

Pika scores clearly higher on entry price and pricing transparency.

Visme scores clearly higher on verified features.

Side by side

A winner is declared only on rows with a clear rule and data on both sides.
Pika vs Visme, field by field
FieldPikaVismeWinner and basis
Cheapest paid plan (billed monthly)✓ $12/month$12.25/monthPika
Same plan, per month billed annually✓ $10/month$12.25/monthPika
Free planYesYesTie
Free trialNoNoTie
Data exportEdited screenshots as images, including 4K, SVG and WebP exports on ProDesigns can be downloaded as JPG, PNG and PDF, and on higher plans as PPTX, HTML5, video and GIFNo winner: no rule for this field
Brand kitYesYesTie
AI design generation–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Publish or schedule to social networks–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Stock photo and element library–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Video and animation–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Team accessYesYesTie

– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.

Sources: Pika pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026; Visme pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026. Each feature value links its own source on the tool's page.

Scorecard, criterion by criterion

Both tools on the graphic design tools scorecard: score 0-100 and the numbers it was computed from.
Pika vs Visme scores
CriterionWeightPikaVisme
Entry price25%81$12/month per seat billed monthly on Team; $10/month billed annually on Team (scored on the monthly price)64$12.25/month per seat billed annually on Starter; no monthly-billed price published (scored against annual-billed prices)
Free plan or trial15%100Free plan100Free plan (Basic)
Pricing transparency10%932 of 2 plans have a public price803 of 4 plans have a public price (1 "contact sales")
Verified features15%402 of 9 tracked features verified: brand kit, team access1006 of 9 tracked features verified: brand kit, ai design generation, publish or schedule to social networks, stock photo and element library, video and animation, team access
API, integrations and export10%100documented data export100documented data export
Cost per user (team of 3)15%69$12 per user per month on Team (team of 3, billed monthly)69$12.25 per user per month on Starter (team of 3, billed annually)
Total score100%79/100 (6 of 7 criteria)83/100 (6 of 7 criteria)

Pika plans

Pika plans
PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyCharged perPublished limits
Team$12$10per userNone stated
Lifetime$299 once–per workspaceNone stated

Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.

Pika pricing in full

Visme plans

Visme plans
PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyCharged perPublished limits
BasicFreeFreeper userNone stated
StarterNot offered$12.25per user
  • 1 storage gb
ProNot offered$24.75per user
  • 10 storage gb
EnterpriseContact salesContact salesNot stated
  • 25 storage gb

Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.

Visme pricing in full

How we picked

Every one of these graphic design tools is scored by the same 7 criteria (scorecard v1). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to graphic design tools. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.

Scorecard criteria and weights
CriterionWeightTypeWhat we measure
Entry price25%CorePrice per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other graphic design tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $7.99/month or less = 100, $66 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $5/month or less = 100, $59 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored.
Free plan or trial15%CoreWhether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored.
Pricing transparency10%CoreHow much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored.
Verified features15%CoreHow many of the 9 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (brand kit, ai design generation, background remover, resize a design for each social format, publish or schedule to social networks, stock photo and element library, video and animation, team access, print ordering). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 5 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored.
API, integrations and export10%CoreWhether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored.
Cost per user (team of 3)15%CategoryMonthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Log scale: $5 per user or less = 100, $88 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored.
Template library10%CategoryNumber of templates the vendor says it offers.Log scale: 10,000 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored.

Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.

Questions, answered from the data

Is Pika cheaper than Visme?

Pika starts lower: $12 per user per month billed monthly ($10 billed yearly) on the Team plan, against $12.25 per user per month billed yearly on the Starter plan for Visme. Check the unit: per-user and per-account prices scale differently.

Do Pika and Visme have free plans?

Both have a free plan.

Which is better, Pika or Visme?

On our scorecard Visme scores higher (83/100 (6 of 7 criteria) vs 79/100 (6 of 7 criteria)). The score weighs every criterion the same way for every tool; check the rows above for the ones that matter to you.