Social media scheduling

Top Keryo competitors 10 competitors in Keryo's market

Competitors listed
10
Ranked on the scorecard
7
Keryo's rank
Not ranked
With a free plan
4

Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify

These are the 10 tools closest to Keryo in its own market: social media scheduling tools that list social media scheduling too, picked by shared categories and how close their entry price is to Keryo's (the rules are below).

7 of them are ranked on the social media scheduling tools scorecard; Typefully is the highest at 81/100 (#16 of 117 in the category).

Keryo is not ranked: 25% of the scorecard weight has verified data, under the 60% we require.

4 competitors have a free plan.

Keryo vs its competitors: market position

Keryo is the highlighted row. Rank is the position in the social media scheduling tools ranking.
Keryo and its competitors
RankToolScoreFrom, billed monthlyFrom, billed yearlyFree planPlatformsFeatures verifiedData checked
–KeryoThis toolNot ranked–––74 of 19Oct 14, 2026
#16Typefully81/100FreeFreeYes, 1 user56 of 19Oct 14, 2026
#39Sally72/100$9.99/moNot offeredYes32 of 19Oct 14, 2026
#54AdaptlyPost68/100$19/moNot offeredNo86 of 19Oct 14, 2026
#78Contant59/100$19/moNot offeredYes, 1 workspace15 of 19Oct 14, 2026
#88Quuu55/100$19.79/account/mo$16.49/account/moNo44 of 19Oct 14, 2026
#99Picmim46/100$40/mo$33/moNo310 of 19Oct 14, 2026
#111automate-for-growth33/100$29/moNot offeredNo43 of 19Oct 14, 2026
–Moonya AINot ranked–––95 of 19Oct 14, 2026
–PosteziNot rankedNot offeredNot offeredNo33 of 19Oct 14, 2026
–ShowsFarmNot ranked––Yes23 of 19Oct 14, 2026

Each value links the page it was read from (hover for the check date).

– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.

How each competitor differs from Keryo

Computed from verified facts on both sides; a feature counts as missing only when the vendor states it.
  1. Typefully · #16, 81/100

    Collaborative social media scheduler and writing editor for X, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Threads and Mastodon, with AI writing help, a calendar and analytics.

    • Score: 81/100, #16 of 117
    • Entry price: free; no paid plans published source
    • Platforms: 5 platforms (Keryo: 7); not on Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and YouTube; adds Bluesky and Mastodon
    • Verified features: Calendar view, First-comment scheduling, Direct auto-publishing, Post and account analytics, Report exports (PDF/CSV) and 2 more

    10 of 24 tracked details verified

    Typefully reviewPricing

    Typefully homepage (screenshot)
    Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026
  2. Sally · #39, 72/100

    Personal brand assistant that turns voice notes or typed updates into drafted posts and schedules them to LinkedIn, TikTok and Instagram.

    • Score: 72/100, #39 of 117
    • Entry price: $9.99 billed monthly; not compared with Keryo, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Platforms: 3 platforms (Keryo: 7); not on Facebook, X (Twitter), YouTube and Threads
    • Verified features: Direct auto-publishing, Best-time-to-post suggestions

    4 of 24 tracked details verified

    Sally reviewPricing

  3. AdaptlyPost · #54, 68/100

    Social media scheduler that publishes to many platforms from a dashboard or AI agents, with a calendar, AI captions, image generation and analytics.

    • Score: 68/100, #54 of 117
    • Entry price: $19 billed monthly; not compared with Keryo, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Platforms: 8 platforms (Keryo: 7); adds Bluesky
    • Verified features: Posting queue, Bulk scheduling (CSV or multi-post), Calendar view, AI caption assistant, Post and account analytics and 2 more

    9 of 24 tracked details verified

    AdaptlyPost reviewPricing

  4. Contant · #78, 59/100

    LinkedIn-focused platform for AI-written posts, carousel design, scheduling, analytics and identifying post engagers to add to an outreach CRM.

    • Score: 59/100, #78 of 117
    • Entry price: $19 billed monthly; not compared with Keryo, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Platforms: 1 platform (Keryo: 7); not on Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X (Twitter), YouTube and Threads
    • Matches Keryo: has all 4 features we verified for Keryo

    7 of 24 tracked details verified

    Contant reviewPricing

  5. Quuu · #88, 55/100

    AI social media agent that learns a user's brand voice, generates posts and images, and schedules them to X, LinkedIn, Facebook and Bluesky.

    • Score: 55/100, #88 of 117
    • Entry price: $19.79 per social account billed monthly; not compared with Keryo, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Platforms: 4 platforms (Keryo: 7); not on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and Threads; adds Bluesky
    • Verified features: AI caption assistant, Post and account analytics, Best-time-to-post suggestions, Approval workflows

    6 of 24 tracked details verified

    Quuu reviewPricing

  6. Picmim · #99, 46/100

    Service that reads a business website, drafts a week of social posts with captions and images, and publishes the approved posts on a calendar to connected accounts.

    • Score: 46/100, #99 of 117
    • Entry price: $40 billed monthly; not compared with Keryo, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Platforms: 3 platforms (Keryo: 7); not on TikTok, X (Twitter), YouTube and Threads
    • Verified features: Calendar view, First-comment scheduling, Direct auto-publishing, Media library, AI caption assistant and 5 more

    13 of 24 tracked details verified

    Picmim reviewPricing

  7. automate-for-growth · #111, 33/100

    AI tool that turns a business website into a month of social media posts to review, edit, schedule and publish.

    • Score: 33/100, #111 of 117
    • Entry price: $29 billed monthly; not compared with Keryo, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Platforms: 4 platforms (Keryo: 7); not on Instagram, TikTok, X (Twitter) and YouTube; adds Pinterest
    • Verified features: Calendar view, Direct auto-publishing, AI caption assistant

    5 of 24 tracked details verified

    automate-for-growth reviewPricing

  8. Moonya AI

    AI service that learns a small business from its website, then writes, designs and schedules social posts for approval across nine networks.

    • Score: not ranked (25% coverage)
    • Platforms: 9 platforms (Keryo: 7); adds Pinterest and Google Business Profile
    • Verified features: Calendar view, Direct auto-publishing, AI caption assistant, Approval workflows, Unified social inbox

    6 of 24 tracked details verified

    Moonya AI review

  9. Postezi

    Tool that turns GitHub commits, pull requests and releases into AI-drafted social posts that the user approves before they publish.

    • Score: not ranked (50% coverage)
    • Platforms: 3 platforms (Keryo: 7); not on Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, YouTube and Threads; adds Bluesky
    • Verified features: Posting queue, Direct auto-publishing, AI caption assistant

    5 of 24 tracked details verified

    Postezi reviewPricing

  10. ShowsFarm

    Content tool that uses AI to write and render TikTok slideshow carousels and YouTube Shorts and then schedules and publishes them.

    • Score: not ranked (35% coverage)
    • Platforms: 2 platforms (Keryo: 7); not on Instagram, Facebook, X (Twitter), LinkedIn and Threads
    • Verified features: Bulk scheduling (CSV or multi-post), Direct auto-publishing, AI caption assistant, Public API

    6 of 24 tracked details verified

    ShowsFarm review

How we picked

  1. Pool: tools in the same market as the tool on this page: they list its primary category, and their own primary category is one it lists too. Explicit competitor links count as well.
  2. Closest first, at most 10: explicit competitors, then the same primary category, then more shared categories, then the smallest gap in entry price (per month, on a log scale), then more shared platforms, then name.
  3. Order on the page: tools ranked on the category scorecard by their category rank, then tools that are not ranked (no scorecard, or under 60% of the weight with verified data) in closeness order.
  4. Prices are compared only on the same billing basis (billed monthly with billed monthly, billed annually with billed annually). A feature counts as missing only when the vendor's page states it; a feature the vendor does not mention is not listed either way.

Every value is read from the vendor's own pages (or GitHub for licences and stars) and shown with the date we checked it. A value we could not verify is shown as a dash, never estimated, and never read as a “no”. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Methodology

The scorecard behind the ranks

Every one of these social media scheduling tools is scored by the same 8 criteria (scorecard v2). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to social media scheduling tools. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.

Scorecard criteria and weights
CriterionWeightTypeWhat we measure
Entry price25%CorePrice per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other social media scheduling tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $9/month or less = 100, $49 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $9/month or less = 100, $58 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored.
Free plan or trial15%CoreWhether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored.
Pricing transparency10%CoreHow much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored.
Verified features15%CoreHow many of the 19 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (posting queue, bulk scheduling (csv or multi-post), calendar view, first-comment scheduling, direct auto-publishing, recurring posts, media library, ai caption assistant, post and account analytics, report exports (pdf/csv), best-time-to-post suggestions, approval workflows, user roles and permissions, separate client workspaces, unified social inbox, white-label reports, link tracking (utm / short links), content repurposing, ugc collection). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 10 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored.
API, integrations and export10%CoreWhether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored.
Platform coverage10%CategoryHow many of the 15 social platforms we track the vendor says the tool supports.Linear: platforms / 10 x 100, capped at 100. No verified platform list = not scored.
Cost per connected account10%CategoryMonthly price per connected account on the cheapest paid plan that allows at least 3 social accounts.Log scale: $2 per account or less = 100, $40 or more = 0. Plans that do not state an account limit are not used.
Free plan limits5%CategoryWhat the free plan allows: connected accounts (full marks at 3), scheduled posts per month (full marks at 100).Each stated limit linear up to its full mark (unlimited = 100), averaged. Tools without a free plan, or whose free plan states none of these limits, are not scored here.

Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.

Questions, answered from the data

Who are Keryo's main competitors?

By our scorecard, the highest-ranked of its closest competitors are Typefully (81/100), Sally (72/100) and AdaptlyPost (68/100).

Which Keryo competitor is cheapest?

Billed monthly, Sally starts lowest at $9.99 a month (Monthly). Entry plans differ in limits.

How does Keryo rank against its competitors?

Keryo is not ranked yet: 25% of the scorecard weight has verified data.

Which Keryo competitors have a free plan?

Typefully, Sally, Contant and ShowsFarm.