For marketing calendar software, Wecrely ranks first on our scorecard with 99 out of 100, ahead of Airtable at 98. The criterion that decides it is entry price: $9.99/month billed monthly on Pro (scored on the monthly price), against Free: the pricing page lists no paid plan.
Planning calendar or publishing calendar
Marketing calendar software splits into two jobs, and picking the wrong one is the usual regret. A planning calendar holds ideas, owners and due dates for campaigns, blog posts and newsletters. A publishing calendar goes further and pushes posts out to social networks on schedule. The tools in this ranking sit at different points on that line.
Start with the question of who touches the calendar. A solo creator needs a place to hold ideas and dates. A small team needs shared access and approvals, so a manager can sign off before anything goes out. An agency needs separate client workspaces. Each step usually moves you to a higher plan, so the entry price is rarely the price you pay.
Read the score with that in mind. The scorecard weights price, limits, export, API, cost for a team of three and the platforms a tool lists. It does not judge how pleasant a planner is to use, and it cannot see how a calendar handles a blog or email schedule. Treat it as a way to shortlist, then try the free plan or trial. The content calendar category lists every tool in the catalogue, including those not profiled below.
How we picked
Calendar tools get expensive when more people join, so the criteria weight cost per user for a small team and the social platforms a vendor lists, on top of the criteria every category shares: real cost, limits, getting your data out, lock-in and API. See how we score for the formulas.
Every one of the 19 content calendar tools we looked at is scored by the same 7 criteria (scorecard version 1), each from the vendor's own pricing page, docs or changelog. 14 had enough verified data to be ranked. A criterion without verified data is left out and the remaining weights are re-normalised; under 60% of the weight covered means the tool is not ranked.
| Criterion | Weight | Type | What we measure and how |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | Core | Price per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other content calendar tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Formula: Log scale. Billed monthly: $9.99/month or less = 100, $68 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $15.26/month or less = 100, $61.02 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored. |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | Core | Whether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Formula: Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored. |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | Core | How much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.Formula: 80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored. |
| Verified features | 15% | Core | How many of the 4 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Formula: Linear: verified features / 2 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored. |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | Core | Whether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Formula: Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored. |
| Cost per user (team of 3) | 15% | Category | Monthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Formula: Log scale: $9.53 per user or less = 100, $38.11 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored. |
| Platform coverage | 10% | Category | How many of the 15 social platforms we track the vendor says the tool supports.Formula: Linear: platforms / 10 x 100, capped at 100. No verified platform list = not scored. |
The ranking
The order is computed from verified vendor data and carries a check date per tool. Tools with too little data are listed without a score. Note that prices mix units: one tool lists a yearly price and others a monthly price.
| # | Tool | Score | Coverage | From, billed monthly | Free plan | Platforms | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 99/100 | 65%4 of 7 criteria | $9.99/mo | Yes | 5 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 2 | 98/100 | 75%5 of 7 criteria | Free | Yes | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 3 | 92/100 | 90%6 of 7 criteria | Not offered | Yes | 8 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 4 | 81/100 | 100%7 of 7 criteria | $33/mo | Yes | 9 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 5 | 79/100 | 65%4 of 7 criteria | $5/mo | No | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 6 | 75/100 | 100%7 of 7 criteria | Not offered | No | 11 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 7 | 74/100 | 75%5 of 7 criteria | $39/mo | Yes, 15 scheduled posts total | 11 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 8 | 72/100 | 75%5 of 7 criteria | Not offered | Yes, 3 social accounts | 5 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 9 | 67/100 | 80%5 of 7 criteria | $49/mo | Yes, 1 user | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 10 | 60/100 | 90%6 of 7 criteria | $29/mo | No | 3 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 11 | 58/100 | 80%5 of 7 criteria | $29/mo | No | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 12 | 51/100 | 90%6 of 7 criteria | $69/mo | No | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 13 | 46/100 | 100%7 of 7 criteria | $65/mo | No | 8 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| 14 | 39/100 | 90%6 of 7 criteria | $68/mo | No | 5 | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| – | Not ranked | 50%4 of 7 criteria | Contact sales | No | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| – | Not ranked | 50%4 of 7 criteria | Free | Yes, 1 user | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| – | Not ranked | 40%3 of 7 criteria | Not offered | No | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| – | Not ranked | 15%1 of 7 criteria | – | – | – | Oct 14, 2026 | |
| – | Not ranked | 10%1 of 7 criteria | – | – | 4 | Oct 14, 2026 |
Each value links the vendor page it was read from (hover for the check date). Coverage is the share of the scorecard's weight with verified data, and "N of M criteria" how many criteria the score is based on; a tool is ranked at 60% or more.
Score is 0 to 100 on the category scorecard; coverage is the share of scorecard weight with verified data. Prices are list prices in US dollars from each vendor's pricing page; the Checked column is the newest date any fact of that tool was verified. 5 listed without a score because under 60% of the weight has verified data. How the score works: methodology.
The tools
Wecrely
Rank 1 with a score of 99/100 (based on 4 of 7 criteria, 65% of the scorecard weight verified). Pricing checked Oct 14, 2026.
Scores highest on
- Entry price (100/100): $9.99/month billed monthly on Pro (scored on the monthly price)
- Free plan or trial (100/100): Free plan (Free)
Scores lowest on
- Pricing transparency (93/100): 2 of 2 plans have a public price
- Verified features (100/100): 3 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, templates, ai assistant
- API, integrations and export: no published data, left out of the total
- Cost per user (team of 3): no published data, left out of the total
- Platform coverage: no published data, left out of the total
Full score breakdown with sources
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 38% | 100 | $9.99/month billed monthly on Pro (scored on the monthly price) source |
| Free plan or trial | 23% | 100 | Free plan (Free) source |
| Pricing transparency | 15% | 93 | 2 of 2 plans have a public price source |
| Verified features | 23% | 100 | 3 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, templates, ai assistant source |
| API, integrations and export | – | Excluded | No published data: left out, the other criteria are re-weighted. |
| Cost per user (team of 3)category criterion | – | Excluded | No published data: left out, the other criteria are re-weighted. |
| Platform coveragecategory criterion | – | Excluded | No published data: left out, the other criteria are re-weighted. |
| Total | 65% covered4 of 7 criteria | 99/100 | Rank #1 in this category, based on 4 of 7 criteria |
Wecrely is a card-based planning canvas for content creators: ideas, scripts and posts live on cards, with a calendar view and templates. It is the first-ranked tool here largely because it is cheap and has a free plan, so it suits a solo creator or a very small team that wants a light planner.
The paid plan is Pro at $9.99 per month. It lists 5 platforms: Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X (Twitter), YouTube.
- Free plan: Yes; trial: No free trial.
- Templates: Yes; AI assist: Yes.
Airtable
Rank 2 with a score of 98/100 (based on 5 of 7 criteria, 75% of the scorecard weight verified). Pricing checked Oct 14, 2026.
Scores highest on
- Entry price (100/100): Free: the pricing page lists no paid plan
- Free plan or trial (100/100): Free plan (Free)
Scores lowest on
- Pricing transparency (87/100): 1 of 1 plans have a public price
- API, integrations and export (100/100): public API
- Cost per user (team of 3): no published data, left out of the total
- Platform coverage: no published data, left out of the total
Full score breakdown with sources
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 33% | 100 | Free: the pricing page lists no paid plan source |
| Free plan or trial | 20% | 100 | Free plan (Free) source |
| Pricing transparency | 13% | 87 | 1 of 1 plans have a public price source |
| Verified features | 20% | 100 | 4 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant source 1source 2 |
| API, integrations and export | 13% | 100 | public API source |
| Cost per user (team of 3)category criterion | – | Excluded | No published data: left out, the other criteria are re-weighted. |
| Platform coveragecategory criterion | – | Excluded | No published data: left out, the other criteria are re-weighted. |
| Total | 75% covered5 of 7 criteria | 98/100 | Rank #2 in this category, based on 5 of 7 criteria |
Airtable is a general no-code database, not a marketing tool, and it scores 98 out of 100 on price and plan data, not on calendar features. That makes it the most flexible option here: teams build their own content calendar from a template, with fields for owner, channel and status. The cost is setup time, since nothing is ready out of the box.
Our catalogue lists only the free plan for Airtable, so the cost of a team calendar with more records or seats is not in our data. Check its pricing page before you commit.
Planoly
Rank 3 with a score of 92/100 (based on 6 of 7 criteria, 90% of the scorecard weight verified). Pricing checked Oct 14, 2026.
Scores highest on
- Entry price (100/100): $14/month billed annually on Starter; no monthly-billed price published (scored against annual-billed prices)
- Free plan or trial (100/100): Free plan
Scores lowest on
- Cost per user (team of 3) (64/100): $15.67 per user per month on Pro (team of 3, billed annually)
- Platform coverage (80/100): 8 of 15 tracked platforms supported
- API, integrations and export: no published data, left out of the total
Full score breakdown with sources
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 28% | 100 | $14/month billed annually on Starter; no monthly-billed price published (scored against annual-billed prices) source |
| Free plan or trial | 17% | 100 | Free plan source |
| Pricing transparency | 11% | 100 | 3 of 3 plans have a public price source |
| Verified features | 17% | 100 | 4 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant source 1source 2 |
| API, integrations and export | – | Excluded | No published data: left out, the other criteria are re-weighted. |
| Cost per user (team of 3)category criterion | 17% | 64 | $15.67 per user per month on Pro (team of 3, billed annually) source |
| Platform coveragecategory criterion | 11% | 80 | 8 of 15 tracked platforms supported source |
| Total | 90% covered6 of 7 criteria | 92/100 | Rank #3 in this category, based on 6 of 7 criteria |
Planoly lists 8 platforms: Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X (Twitter), LinkedIn, YouTube, Pinterest, Threads. It combines a calendar, auto posting, an Instagram grid preview, AI idea generation and a link-in-bio page. It fits a brand or creator whose calendar is mostly visual posts.
Plans are flat and scale with team size: Starter is $14 per month for 1 user, Growth is $24 per month for 2 users and Pro is $47 per month for 6 users.
- Free plan: Yes; trial: 14-day free trial.
- Auto publish: Yes; bulk scheduling: Yes.
Planable
Rank 4 with a score of 81/100 (based on 7 of 7 criteria, 100% of the scorecard weight verified). Pricing checked Oct 14, 2026.
Scores highest on
- Free plan or trial (100/100): Free plan (Free)
- Verified features (100/100): 3 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, ai assistant
Scores lowest on
- Entry price (38/100): $33/month billed monthly on Basic (scored on the monthly price)
- Platform coverage (90/100): 9 of 15 tracked platforms supported
Full score breakdown with sources
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | 38 | $33/month billed monthly on Basic (scored on the monthly price) source |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | 100 | Free plan (Free) source |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 93 | 2 of 2 plans have a public price source |
| Verified features | 15% | 100 | 3 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, ai assistant source |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | 100 | public API source |
| Cost per user (team of 3)category criterion | 15% | 90 | $11 per user per month on Basic (team of 3, billed monthly) source |
| Platform coveragecategory criterion | 10% | 90 | 9 of 15 tracked platforms supported source |
| Total | 100% covered7 of 7 criteria | 81/100 | Rank #4 in this category, based on 7 of 7 criteria |
Planable is built around collaboration: feed and calendar views, step-by-step approvals and client workspaces. It is the fit for an agency or a team where content needs sign-off before posting. The Basic plan is $33 per month with unlimited users, which makes it a good value for a team that would otherwise pay per seat.
CoSchedule
Rank 7 with a score of 74/100 (based on 5 of 7 criteria, 75% of the scorecard weight verified). Pricing checked Oct 14, 2026.
Scores highest on
- Free plan or trial (100/100): Free plan (Free)
- Verified features (100/100): 4 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant
Scores lowest on
- Entry price (29/100): $39/month billed monthly on Starter; $29/month billed annually on Starter (scored on the monthly price)
- Pricing transparency (80/100): 3 of 4 plans have a public price (1 "contact sales")
- API, integrations and export: no published data, left out of the total
- Cost per user (team of 3): no published data, left out of the total
Full score breakdown with sources
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 33% | 29 | $39/month billed monthly on Starter; $29/month billed annually on Starter (scored on the monthly price) source |
| Free plan or trial | 20% | 100 | Free plan (Free) source |
| Pricing transparency | 13% | 80 | 3 of 4 plans have a public price (1 "contact sales") source |
| Verified features | 20% | 100 | 4 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant source |
| API, integrations and export | – | Excluded | No published data: left out, the other criteria are re-weighted. |
| Cost per user (team of 3)category criterion | – | Excluded | No published data: left out, the other criteria are re-weighted. |
| Platform coveragecategory criterion | 13% | 100 | 11 of 15 tracked platforms supported source |
| Total | 75% covered5 of 7 criteria | 74/100 | Rank #7 in this category, based on 5 of 7 criteria |
CoSchedule is social media management software built around a marketing calendar, with approvals (Yes), roles and permissions (Yes) and client workspaces (Yes). It suits a marketing manager who wants one calendar for campaigns and social posts.
The free plan is small: 15 scheduled posts total, 1 social account. The Starter plan costs $39 per month ($29 per month, billed annually) with 3 social accounts and 1 user; Professional adds a second user at $59 per month.
- Trial: 14-day free trial; approvals: Yes.
- Recurring posts: Yes; templates: Yes.
ContentStudio
Rank 6 with a score of 75/100 (based on 7 of 7 criteria, 100% of the scorecard weight verified). Pricing checked Oct 14, 2026.
Scores highest on
- Verified features (100/100): 3 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, ai assistant
- API, integrations and export (100/100): public API, documented data export
Scores lowest on
- Cost per user (team of 3) (10/100): $33 per user per month on Agency Unlimited (team of 3, billed annually)
- Free plan or trial (60/100): Free trial (7 days), no free plan
Full score breakdown with sources
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | 84 | $19/month billed annually on Standard; no monthly-billed price published (scored against annual-billed prices) source |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | 60 | Free trial (7 days), no free plan source |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 80 | 3 of 4 plans have a public price (1 "contact sales") source |
| Verified features | 15% | 100 | 3 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, ai assistant source |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | 100 | public API, documented data export source 1source 2 |
| Cost per user (team of 3)category criterion | 15% | 10 | $33 per user per month on Agency Unlimited (team of 3, billed annually) source |
| Platform coveragecategory criterion | 10% | 100 | 11 of 15 tracked platforms supported source |
| Total | 100% covered7 of 7 criteria | 75/100 | Rank #6 in this category, based on 7 of 7 criteria |
ContentStudio pairs a content calendar with AI content creation, a social inbox and agency approvals. It lists 11 platforms, level with CoSchedule at the top of this group, and it has a statement on export: Reports can be scheduled, exported or emailed.
Read its price carefully. The entry plan is listed at $228 per year, a yearly figure; billed annually that is $19 per month, billed annually. The Standard plan covers 5 social accounts and 1 user.
- Trial: 7-day free trial; free plan: No.
- Client workspaces: Yes; white-label reports: Yes.
Loomly
Rank 13 with a score of 46/100 (based on 7 of 7 criteria, 100% of the scorecard weight verified). Pricing checked Oct 14, 2026.
Scores highest on
- Verified features (100/100): 2 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, ai assistant
- API, integrations and export (100/100): documented data export
Scores lowest on
- Free plan or trial (0/100): No free plan or free trial shown on the pricing page
- Entry price (2/100): $65/month billed monthly on Starter; $49/month billed annually on Starter (scored on the monthly price)
Full score breakdown with sources
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | 2 | $65/month billed monthly on Starter; $49/month billed annually on Starter (scored on the monthly price) source |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | 0 | No free plan or free trial shown on the pricing page source |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 67 | 2 of 3 plans have a public price (1 "contact sales") source |
| Verified features | 15% | 100 | 2 of 4 tracked features verified: analytics, ai assistant source |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | 100 | documented data export source |
| Cost per user (team of 3)category criterion | 15% | 41 | $21.67 per user per month on Starter (team of 3, billed monthly) source |
| Platform coveragecategory criterion | 10% | 80 | 8 of 15 tracked platforms supported source |
| Total | 100% covered7 of 7 criteria | 46/100 | Rank #13 in this category, based on 7 of 7 criteria |
Loomly is a social media calendar and publishing tool with approval workflows and reports. It has the highest entry price of the tools profiled here at $65 per month ($49 per month, billed annually), which pulls its score down, but the plan includes 3 users and 12 social accounts.
Loomly suits an agency that values approvals and report exports and has the budget. It is hard to recommend to a solo user.
- Free plan: No; trial: No free trial.
- Approvals: Yes; export: Reports, plus content in list, calendar and post views.
Who should not pick it
- Teams that need approvals before posting should not pick Wecrely: its listed features are templates, analytics and AI assist, with no approvals shown, while Planable lists approvals as Yes.
- Marketers who want a ready-made calendar should not pick Airtable: it is a general database, and its catalogue entry lists only a free plan (Yes) with no verified paid price.
- Solo users on a tight budget should not pick Loomly: the entry plan is $65 per month and there is no free plan (No).
- Anyone who wants a free plan that can run a real calendar should check CoSchedule first: the free plan lists 15 scheduled posts total, 1 social account.
- Teams that compare prices by month should not read ContentStudio at face value: its entry price is a yearly figure, $228 per year.
What we did not test
We did not open any of these calendars or plan a campaign in them. The data comes from vendor pricing and feature pages and is scored by code, so it tells you what a vendor publishes and what it costs, not how pleasant a calendar is to use, how reliably posts go out, how well approvals work in practice or how helpful support is. Use a free plan or trial with a real month of content before you move your team. For the full list of what we leave out, see what we leave out. If you also need scheduling across networks, read our guide to social media management tools.
– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.
Frequently asked questions
Is there free marketing calendar software?
Yes, several tools list a free plan. Wecrely lists one (Yes) with a Pro plan at $9.99 per month, Planable lists one (Yes), and CoSchedule lists 15 scheduled posts total, 1 social account. Check the limits on the vendor's pricing page before you plan around a free tier.
Do I need a calendar tool that can publish posts?
Only if you want planning and posting in one place. CoSchedule lists auto publishing (Yes) and Planoly lists it too (Yes). A planning-only tool such as Airtable organizes the work but leaves posting to another system.
How do marketing calendar tools charge?
Mostly per month on a flat plan, but not always. ContentStudio lists its entry plan at $228 per year, which is a yearly price, while Planoly lists $14 per month. Compare the unit as well as the number.
Which calendar tools support client approvals?
Approval workflows are listed for Planable (Yes), CoSchedule (Yes), ContentStudio (Yes) and Loomly (Yes). They are not listed for every tool in the table.
Which of the content calendar tools ranks first on SaaSHunter?
Wecrely has the highest score, 99 out of 100, among the 14 content calendar tools with enough verified data to be ranked. Its facts were last checked Oct 14, 2026. Scores are computed from the published scorecard and change when the underlying facts change.
Which content calendar tools have a free plan?
7 of the 14 ranked content calendar tools list a free plan: Wecrely, Airtable, Planoly, Planable, CoSchedule, BulletSocial, InternalNewsletter. What the free plan allows differs, so check the limits column before choosing.
What is the lowest starting price among content calendar tools?
Among the ranked content calendar tools, useOrionix has the lowest paid starting price at $5 per month. Tools charge per seat, per connected account or per workspace, so the units differ and the lowest sticker price is not always the lowest bill for your setup.
How are the content calendar tools scored?
Each tool is scored from 0 to 100 on 7 weighted criteria taken from the same scorecard for every tool: entry price, free plan or trial, pricing transparency, verified features, api, integrations and export, cost per user (team of 3), platform coverage. Criteria without verified data are left out and the weights re-normalised; a tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked.