AI writing
Analyse vs Typefully compared on 11 fields
- Analyse score
- 89/100 (6 of 7 criteria)
- Typefully score
- 98/100 (5 of 7 criteria)
- Fields won by Analyse
- 1 of 5
- Fields won by Typefully
- 0 of 5
Analyse
Typefully
Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify
Analyse and Typefully are both AI writing tools. We compared them on 11 fields read from each vendor's own pages.
On the AI writing tools scorecard Analyse scores 89/100 (6 of 7 criteria) and Typefully 98/100 (5 of 7 criteria) (ranks 8 and 1 in the category).
Of the 5 fields with a clear rule (lower price, higher count, yes over no), Analyse wins 1, Typefully wins 0 and 4 are ties.
Analyse scores clearly higher on pricing transparency.
Typefully scores clearly higher on verified features.
Side by side
| Field | Analyse | Typefully | Winner and basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheapest paid plan (billed monthly) | $9/month | – | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Free trial | ✓ Yes | No | Analyse |
| Trial length (days) | 14 | – | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Platforms supported | – | 5 | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Public API | – | Yes | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
| Data export | CSV export | X analytics data as CSV | No winner: no rule for this field |
| Analytics | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Team access | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| AI assistant | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Brand voice | – | Yes | No winner: needs a value on both sides |
– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.
Sources: Analyse pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026; Typefully pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026. Each feature value links its own source on the tool's page.
Scorecard, criterion by criterion
| Criterion | Weight | Analyse | Typefully |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | 100$9/month billed monthly on Starter (scored on the monthly price) | 100Free: the pricing page lists no paid plan |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | 100Free plan (Free) | 100Free plan (Free) |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | 1005 of 5 plans have a public price | 871 of 1 plans have a public price |
| Verified features | 15% | 753 of 8 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, ai assistant | 1004 of 8 tracked features verified: analytics, team access, ai assistant, brand voice |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | 100documented data export | 100public API, documented data export |
| Cost per user (team of 3) | 15% | 58$26.33 per user per month on Pro (team of 3, billed monthly) | – |
| Total score | 100% | 89/100 (6 of 7 criteria) | 98/100 (5 of 7 criteria) |
Analyse plans
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed yearly | Charged per | Published limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free | per workspace | None stated |
| Starter | $9 | Not stated | per workspace | None stated |
| Growth | $29 | Not stated | per workspace | None stated |
| Pro | $79 | Not stated | per workspace |
|
| Network | $249 | Not stated | per workspace | None stated |
Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.
Typefully plans
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed yearly | Charged per | Published limits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | Free | per workspace |
|
Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.
How we picked
Every one of these AI writing tools is scored by the same 7 criteria (scorecard v1). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to AI writing tools. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.
| Criterion | Weight | Type | What we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | Core | Price per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other AI writing tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $9.99/month or less = 100, $69 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $4.92/month or less = 100, $49 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored. |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | Core | Whether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored. |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | Core | How much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored. |
| Verified features | 15% | Core | How many of the 8 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant, brand voice, seo optimisation, plagiarism checker, browser extension). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 4 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored. |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | Core | Whether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored. |
| Cost per user (team of 3) | 15% | Category | Monthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Log scale: $13 per user or less = 100, $69 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored. |
| Languages | 10% | Category | Number of languages the vendor says it offers.Linear scale: 100 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored. |
Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.
Questions, answered from the data
Do Analyse and Typefully have free plans?
Both have a free plan.
Which is better, Analyse or Typefully?
On our scorecard Typefully scores higher (98/100 (5 of 7 criteria) vs 89/100 (6 of 7 criteria)). The score weighs every criterion the same way for every tool; check the rows above for the ones that matter to you.