URL shorteners

Enshort vs Pretty Links compared on 13 fields

Enshort score
94/100 (5 of 8 criteria)
Pretty Links score
67/100 (5 of 8 criteria)
Fields won by Enshort
3 of 5
Fields won by Pretty Links
0 of 5
Enshort
Enshort homepage (screenshot)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026
Pretty Links
Pretty Links homepage (screenshot)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026

Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify

Enshort and Pretty Links are both URL shorteners. We compared them on 13 fields read from each vendor's own pages.

On the URL shorteners scorecard Enshort scores 94/100 (5 of 8 criteria) and Pretty Links 67/100 (5 of 8 criteria) (ranks 4 and 24 in the category).

Of the 5 fields with a clear rule (lower price, higher count, yes over no), Enshort wins 3, Pretty Links wins 0 and 2 are ties.

Enshort scores clearly higher on free plan or trial and entry price.

Side by side

A winner is declared only on rows with a clear rule and data on both sides.
Enshort vs Pretty Links, field by field
FieldEnshortPretty LinksWinner and basis
Cheapest paid plan (billed monthly)✓ $7/month$8.30/monthEnshort
Same plan, per month billed annually$6/month–No winner: needs a value on both sides
Free plan✓ YesNoEnshort
Free trial✓ YesNoEnshort
Trial length (days)30–No winner: needs a value on both sides
Public API–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Data exportCSV export (Scale plan)Links and the click database can be exportedNo winner: no rule for this field
Custom domainYes–No winner: needs a value on both sides
QR codesYesYesTie
Click analyticsYesYesTie
UTM builder–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Link-in-bio page–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Bulk shorteningYes–No winner: needs a value on both sides

– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.

Sources: Enshort pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026; Pretty Links pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026. Each feature value links its own source on the tool's page.

Scorecard, criterion by criterion

Both tools on the URL shorteners scorecard: score 0-100 and the numbers it was computed from.
Enshort vs Pretty Links scores
CriterionWeightEnshortPretty Links
Entry price25%81$7/month billed monthly on Grow; $6/month billed annually on Grow (scored on the monthly price)60$8.30/month billed annually on Beginner; no monthly-billed price published (scored against annual-billed prices)
Free plan or trial15%100Free plan (Free)0No free plan or free trial shown on the pricing page
Pricing transparency10%1003 of 3 plans have a public price1003 of 3 plans have a public price
Verified features15%1004 of 7 tracked features verified: custom domain, qr codes, click analytics, bulk shortening1004 of 7 tracked features verified: qr codes, click analytics, utm builder, link-in-bio page
API, integrations and export10%100documented data export100public API, documented data export
Total score100%94/100 (5 of 8 criteria)67/100 (5 of 8 criteria)

Enshort plans

Enshort plans
PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyCharged perPublished limits
FreeFreeFreeper workspaceNone stated
Grow$7$6per workspaceNone stated
Scale$18$15per workspaceNone stated

Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.

Enshort pricing in full

Pretty Links plans
PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyCharged perPublished limits
BeginnerNot offered$8.30per workspaceNone stated
MarketerNot offered$12.47per workspaceNone stated
Super AffiliateNot offered$16.63per workspaceNone stated

Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.

Pretty Links pricing in full

How we picked

Every one of these URL shorteners is scored by the same 8 criteria (scorecard v1). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to URL shorteners. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.

Scorecard criteria and weights
CriterionWeightTypeWhat we measure
Entry price25%CorePrice per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other URL shorteners on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $5/month or less = 100, $29 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $4/month or less = 100, $24.92 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored.
Free plan or trial15%CoreWhether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored.
Pricing transparency10%CoreHow much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored.
Verified features15%CoreHow many of the 7 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (custom domain, qr codes, click analytics, utm builder, link-in-bio page, bulk shortening, team access). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 4 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored.
API, integrations and export10%CoreWhether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored.
Free plan limits10%CategoryWhat the free plan allows: links (full marks at 100).Each stated limit linear up to its full mark (unlimited = 100), averaged. Tools without a free plan, or whose free plan states none of these limits, are not scored here.
Links on paid plans10%CategoryLinks included on the cheapest paid plan that states a limit.Log scale: 1,000 or more (or unlimited) = 100. No stated limit = not scored.
Cost per user (team of 3)5%CategoryMonthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Log scale: $6.67 per user or less = 100, $30 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored.

Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.

Questions, answered from the data

Is Enshort cheaper than Pretty Links?

Enshort starts lower: $7 per month billed monthly ($6 billed yearly) on the Grow plan, against $8.30 per month billed yearly on the Beginner plan for Pretty Links. Check the unit: per-user and per-account prices scale differently.

Do Enshort and Pretty Links have free plans?

Enshort has a free plan; Pretty Links does not.

Which is better, Enshort or Pretty Links?

On our scorecard Enshort scores higher (94/100 (5 of 8 criteria) vs 67/100 (5 of 8 criteria)). The score weighs every criterion the same way for every tool; check the rows above for the ones that matter to you.