URL shorteners

Pretty Links vs TrackRev compared on 13 fields

Pretty Links score
67/100 (5 of 8 criteria)
TrackRev score
67/100 (6 of 8 criteria)
Fields won by Pretty Links
1 of 6
Fields won by TrackRev
1 of 6
Pretty Links
Pretty Links homepage (screenshot)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026
TrackRev
TrackRev homepage (screenshot)
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026

Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify

Pretty Links and TrackRev are both URL shorteners. We compared them on 13 fields read from each vendor's own pages.

On the URL shorteners scorecard Pretty Links scores 67/100 (5 of 8 criteria) and TrackRev 67/100 (6 of 8 criteria) (ranks 24 and 23 in the category).

Of the 6 fields with a clear rule (lower price, higher count, yes over no), Pretty Links wins 1, TrackRev wins 1 and 4 are ties.

Pretty Links scores clearly higher on entry price.

TrackRev scores clearly higher on free plan or trial.

Side by side

A winner is declared only on rows with a clear rule and data on both sides.
Pretty Links vs TrackRev, field by field
FieldPretty LinksTrackRevWinner and basis
Cheapest paid plan (billed monthly)✓ $8.30/month$24.92/monthPretty Links
Same plan, per month billed annually–$24.92/monthNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Free planNo✓ YesTrackRev
Free trialNoNoTie
Public APIYesYesTie
Data exportLinks and the click database can be exportedEverything as CSVNo winner: no rule for this field
Custom domain–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
QR codesYesYesTie
Click analyticsYesYesTie
UTM builderYes–No winner: needs a value on both sides
Link-in-bio pageYes–No winner: needs a value on both sides
Bulk shortening–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides
Team access–YesNo winner: needs a value on both sides

– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.

Sources: Pretty Links pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026; TrackRev pricing page, checked Oct 14, 2026. Each feature value links its own source on the tool's page.

Scorecard, criterion by criterion

Both tools on the URL shorteners scorecard: score 0-100 and the numbers it was computed from.
Pretty Links vs TrackRev scores
CriterionWeightPretty LinksTrackRev
Entry price25%60$8.30/month billed annually on Beginner; no monthly-billed price published (scored against annual-billed prices)0$29/month billed monthly on Indie; $24.92/month billed annually on Growth (scored on the monthly price)
Free plan or trial15%0No free plan or free trial shown on the pricing page100Free plan
Pricing transparency10%1003 of 3 plans have a public price932 of 2 plans have a public price
Verified features15%1004 of 7 tracked features verified: qr codes, click analytics, utm builder, link-in-bio page1005 of 7 tracked features verified: custom domain, qr codes, click analytics, bulk shortening, team access
API, integrations and export10%100public API, documented data export100public API, documented data export
Cost per user (team of 3)5%–85$8.31 per user per month on Growth (team of 3, billed annually)
Total score100%67/100 (5 of 8 criteria)67/100 (6 of 8 criteria)
Pretty Links plans
PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyCharged perPublished limits
BeginnerNot offered$8.30per workspaceNone stated
MarketerNot offered$12.47per workspaceNone stated
Super AffiliateNot offered$16.63per workspaceNone stated

Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.

Pretty Links pricing in full

TrackRev plans

TrackRev plans
PlanBilled monthlyBilled yearlyCharged perPublished limits
Indie$29Not statedper workspace
  • 1 workspace
GrowthNot offered$24.92per workspace
  • 10 workspaces
  • Unlimited users

Prices in USD per month, before tax. Read from the vendor's pricing page on Oct 14, 2026. "Not stated" means the page does not publish it.

TrackRev pricing in full

How we picked

Every one of these URL shorteners is scored by the same 8 criteria (scorecard v1). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to URL shorteners. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.

Scorecard criteria and weights
CriterionWeightTypeWhat we measure
Entry price25%CorePrice per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other URL shorteners on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $5/month or less = 100, $29 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $4/month or less = 100, $24.92 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored.
Free plan or trial15%CoreWhether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored.
Pricing transparency10%CoreHow much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored.
Verified features15%CoreHow many of the 7 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (custom domain, qr codes, click analytics, utm builder, link-in-bio page, bulk shortening, team access). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 4 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored.
API, integrations and export10%CoreWhether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored.
Free plan limits10%CategoryWhat the free plan allows: links (full marks at 100).Each stated limit linear up to its full mark (unlimited = 100), averaged. Tools without a free plan, or whose free plan states none of these limits, are not scored here.
Links on paid plans10%CategoryLinks included on the cheapest paid plan that states a limit.Log scale: 1,000 or more (or unlimited) = 100. No stated limit = not scored.
Cost per user (team of 3)5%CategoryMonthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Log scale: $6.67 per user or less = 100, $30 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored.

Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.

Questions, answered from the data

Is Pretty Links cheaper than TrackRev?

Pretty Links starts lower: $8.30 per month billed yearly on the Beginner plan, against $24.92 per month billed yearly on the Growth plan for TrackRev. Check the unit: per-user and per-account prices scale differently.

Do Pretty Links and TrackRev have free plans?

TrackRev has a free plan; Pretty Links does not.

Which is better, Pretty Links or TrackRev?

On our scorecard TrackRev scores higher (67/100 (6 of 8 criteria) vs 67/100 (5 of 8 criteria)). The score weighs every criterion the same way for every tool; check the rows above for the ones that matter to you.