AI video

Top Luma Dream Machine competitors 10 competitors in Luma Dream Machine's market

Competitors listed
10
Ranked on the scorecard
10
Luma Dream Machine's rank
#118 of 124
With a free plan
3

Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify

These are the 10 tools closest to Luma Dream Machine in its own market: AI video generators that list ai video too, picked by shared categories and how close their entry price is to Luma Dream Machine's (the rules are below).

10 of them are ranked on the AI video generators scorecard; Orelon is the highest at 89/100 (#7 of 124 in the category).

Luma Dream Machine itself is #118 of 124 with 32/100, so 10 competitors on this list rank above it.

Luma Dream Machine's cheapest paid plan is $30 per month billed annually (Plus). On the same billing basis, 5 of 5 competitors with a published price start lower and 0 start higher; entry plans are not like-for-like, so check the limits.

3 competitors have a free plan; Luma Dream Machine does not.

Luma Dream Machine vs its competitors: market position

Luma Dream Machine is the highlighted row. Rank is the position in the AI video generators ranking.
Luma Dream Machine and its competitors
RankToolScoreFrom, billed monthlyFrom, billed yearlyFree planPublic APIFeatures verifiedData checked
#118Luma Dream MachineThis tool32/100Not offered$30/moNoYes2 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#7Orelon89/100$9/mo$8/moYes–2 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#13Pika86/100$10/mo$8/moYesYes2 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#30InVideo77/100Not offered$4/user/moNo–4 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#31KreatorFlow AI77/100$25/mo$20.83/moYesYes6 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#49FlashEdit AI68/100$9.90/moNot offeredNo–2 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#95Veo Pro47/100Not offered$10/moNo–2 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#97MarsClip46/100$29/moNot offeredNo–4 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#103PhotoAIGenerator45/100$19.99/moNot offeredNo–2 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#110seadanse40/100$29.90/moNot offeredNo–3 of 8Oct 14, 2026
#113Knightvision35/100$39.99/moNot offeredNoYes2 of 8Oct 14, 2026

Each value links the page it was read from (hover for the check date).

– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.

How each competitor differs from Luma Dream Machine

Computed from verified facts on both sides; a feature counts as missing only when the vendor states it.
  1. Orelon · #7, 89/100

    AI video and image generator that turns prompts or reference images into clips, with a prompt library, templates and several third-party models.

    • Score: 89/100, #7 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $8 per month billed annually (Trial), $22 less than Luma Dream Machine's $30 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
    • Free plan: yes (Luma Dream Machine: no) source
    • Verified features: Text to video, No watermark on paid plans

    3 of 14 tracked details verified

    Orelon reviewPricing

    Orelon homepage (screenshot)
    Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026
  2. Pika · #13, 86/100

    AI creative platform for generating video, images and audio with several third-party models, plus editing apps such as extend video and color grade.

    • Score: 86/100, #13 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $8 per month billed annually (Starter), $22 less than Luma Dream Machine's $30 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
    • Free plan: yes (Luma Dream Machine: no) source
    • Verified features: Text to video, No watermark on paid plans, Public API

    4 of 14 tracked details verified

    Luma Dream Machine vs PikaPika reviewPricing

  3. InVideo · #30, 77/100

    Online video creation platform with AI agents, a multitrack timeline editor and access to many third-party video, image and audio models, priced per seat with monthly credits.

    • Score: 77/100, #30 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $4 per user per month billed annually (Basic), $26 less than Luma Dream Machine's $30 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
    • Verified features: Text to video, AI avatars, Voice cloning, 4K export

    5 of 14 tracked details verified

    Luma Dream Machine vs InVideoInVideo reviewPricing

  4. KreatorFlow AI · #31, 77/100

    AI image and video generator built on ByteDance Seedance and Seedream models, with face swap, motion transfer, audio, cartoon and workflow canvas tools.

    • Score: 77/100, #31 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $20.83 per month billed annually (Creator), $9.17 less than Luma Dream Machine's $30 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
    • Free plan: yes (Luma Dream Machine: no) source
    • Matches Luma Dream Machine: has all 3 features we verified for Luma Dream Machine

    8 of 14 tracked details verified

    Luma Dream Machine vs KreatorFlow AIKreatorFlow AI reviewPricing

  5. FlashEdit AI · #49, 68/100

    Multi-modal studio that generates AI video, images, music and voice from prompts, with enhancement tools and exports sized for social platforms.

    • Score: 68/100, #49 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $9.90 billed monthly; not compared with Luma Dream Machine, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Verified features: Text to video, No watermark on paid plans

    4 of 14 tracked details verified

    FlashEdit AI reviewPricing

  6. Veo Pro · #95, 47/100

    Web platform for generating AI videos and images from text or images using several third-party video and image models, sold as monthly or yearly credit plans.

    • Score: 47/100, #95 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $10 per month billed annually (Mini), $20 less than Luma Dream Machine's $30 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
    • Verified features: Text to video, 4K export

    3 of 14 tracked details verified

    Veo Pro reviewPricing

  7. MarsClip · #97, 46/100

    AI video creation tool that turns prompts and scripts into narrated, captioned videos and can publish them automatically to TikTok, Instagram and YouTube.

    • Score: 46/100, #97 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $29 billed monthly; not compared with Luma Dream Machine, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Verified features: Text to video, AI avatars, Automatic captions, No watermark on paid plans

    5 of 14 tracked details verified

    MarsClip reviewPricing

  8. PhotoAIGenerator · #103, 45/100

    AI service that produces UGC-style video ads, headshots and product photos from selfies and product images, with a library of AI actors and credit plans.

    • Score: 45/100, #103 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $19.99 billed monthly; not compared with Luma Dream Machine, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Verified features: Automatic captions, No watermark on paid plans

    3 of 14 tracked details verified

    PhotoAIGenerator reviewPricing

  9. seadanse · #110, 40/100

    Web service for generating AI videos and images from prompts, photos and clips with multiple models, sold as credit plans and credit packs.

    • Score: 40/100, #110 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $29.90 billed monthly; not compared with Luma Dream Machine, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Verified features: Text to video, 4K export, No watermark on paid plans

    4 of 14 tracked details verified

    seadanse reviewPricing

  10. Knightvision · #113, 35/100

    AI studio for ad creative that generates videos and images, grades existing ads and writes UGC scripts, available through a web app, API and MCP connector.

    • Score: 35/100, #113 of 124 (Luma Dream Machine: 32/100, #118)
    • Entry price: $39.99 billed monthly; not compared with Luma Dream Machine, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Verified features: Text to video, Automatic captions, Public API

    4 of 14 tracked details verified

    Knightvision reviewPricing

Luma Dream Machine head to head

How we picked

  1. Pool: tools in the same market as the tool on this page: they list its primary category, and their own primary category is one it lists too. Explicit competitor links count as well.
  2. Closest first, at most 10: explicit competitors, then the same primary category, then more shared categories, then the smallest gap in entry price (per month, on a log scale), then more shared platforms, then name.
  3. Order on the page: tools ranked on the category scorecard by their category rank, then tools that are not ranked (no scorecard, or under 60% of the weight with verified data) in closeness order.
  4. Prices are compared only on the same billing basis (billed monthly with billed monthly, billed annually with billed annually). A feature counts as missing only when the vendor's page states it; a feature the vendor does not mention is not listed either way.

Every value is read from the vendor's own pages (or GitHub for licences and stars) and shown with the date we checked it. A value we could not verify is shown as a dash, never estimated, and never read as a “no”. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Methodology

The scorecard behind the ranks

Every one of these AI video generators is scored by the same 8 criteria (scorecard v2). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to AI video generators. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.

Scorecard criteria and weights
CriterionWeightTypeWhat we measure
Entry price25%CorePrice per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other AI video generators on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $9/month or less = 100, $39 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $4.50/month or less = 100, $25 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored.
Free plan or trial15%CoreWhether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored.
Pricing transparency10%CoreHow much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored.
Verified features15%CoreHow many of the 8 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (text to video, ai avatars, voice cloning, automatic captions, ai dubbing / translation, 4k export, no watermark on paid plans, brand kit). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 4 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored.
API, integrations and export10%CoreWhether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (50 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored.
Cost per video minute10%CategoryPrice per video minute on the cheapest paid plan that states a monthly minutes limit (monthly price / allowance).Log scale: $0.50 per video minute or less = 100, $10 or more = 0. Unlimited or unstated allowances = not scored.
Languages10%CategoryNumber of languages the vendor says it offers.Linear scale: 100 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored.
Avatar library5%CategoryNumber of stock avatars the vendor says it offers.Linear scale: 200 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored.

Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.

Questions, answered from the data

Who are Luma Dream Machine's main competitors?

By our scorecard, the highest-ranked of its closest competitors are Orelon (89/100), Pika (86/100) and InVideo (77/100).

Which Luma Dream Machine competitor is cheapest?

Billed monthly, Orelon starts lowest at $9 a month (Trial). Entry plans differ in limits.

How does Luma Dream Machine rank against its competitors?

Luma Dream Machine is #118 of 124 ranked AI video generators with 32/100.

Which Luma Dream Machine competitors have a free plan?

Orelon, Pika and KreatorFlow AI.