AI writing
Top Propelr competitors 10 competitors in Propelr's market
- Competitors listed
- 10
- Ranked on the scorecard
- 9
- Propelr's rank
- #22 of 59
- With a free plan
- 6
Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify
These are the 10 tools closest to Propelr in its own market: AI writing tools that list ai writing too, picked by shared categories and how close their entry price is to Propelr's (the rules are below).
9 of them are ranked on the AI writing tools scorecard; Authormity is the highest at 92/100 (#4 of 59 in the category).
Propelr itself is #22 of 59 with 76/100, so 5 competitors on this list rank above it.
Propelr's cheapest paid plan is $19 billed monthly (Pro). On the same billing basis, 3 of 7 competitors with a published price start lower and 1 start higher; entry plans are not like-for-like, so check the limits.
6 competitors have a free plan, and so does Propelr.
Propelr vs its competitors: market position
| Rank | Tool | Score | From, billed monthly | From, billed yearly | Free plan | Public API | Features verified | Data checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #22 | PropelrThis tool | 76/100 | $19/mo | Not offered | Yes, 5 credits per month | – | 2 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #4 |  Authormity | 92/100 | – | – | Yes | – | 3 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #7 |  CannerAI | 90/100 | $9/mo | Not offered | Yes, 3 images per month | – | 5 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #11 |  LinkGenie | 87/100 | $19/mo | $15.20/mo | Yes | – | 4 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #16 |  Arcitext | 79/100 | $15/mo | Not offered | No | – | 3 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #17 |  Revise AI | 79/100 | $16/mo | $8/mo | Yes, 2,000 words per month | – | 3 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #23 |  Scripti AI | 76/100 | $19/mo | Not offered | Yes | – | 2 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #24 |  NeuronWriter | 76/100 | $23/mo | $19/mo | No | Yes | 5 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #26 |  AutoBlogWriter | 72/100 | $19/mo | $14/mo | No | – | 3 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| #48 | RedactAI | 51/100 | Not offered | $11.90/mo | No | – | 2 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| – |  Feedkraft | Not ranked | – | – | Yes, 1 workspace | – | 1 of 8 | Oct 14, 2026 |
Each value links the page it was read from (hover for the check date).
– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.
How each competitor differs from Propelr
- Authormity · #4, 92/100
LinkedIn content tool that learns a user's writing style from past posts, scores hooks before publishing, plans a multi-week calendar and schedules posts.
- Score: 92/100, #4 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Platforms: 1 platform (Propelr: 2); not on X (Twitter)
- Verified features: Analytics, Brand voice, Browser extension
4 of 13 tracked details verified
Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026 - CannerAI · #7, 90/100
AI content workspace that drafts LinkedIn and X posts in the user's voice from videos, articles and notes and publishes them on a schedule.
- Score: 90/100, #7 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Entry price: $9 billed monthly (Creator), $10 less than Propelr's $19 source
- Platforms: 2 platforms (Propelr: 2)
- Verified features: Team access, Templates, AI assistant, Brand voice, Browser extension
6 of 13 tracked details verified
- LinkGenie · #11, 87/100
AI writing and scheduling tool for LinkedIn that learns a user's tone, drafts posts, publishes them to LinkedIn and reports post analytics.
- Score: 87/100, #11 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Entry price: $19 billed monthly (Starter), the same as Propelr (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
- Platforms: 1 platform (Propelr: 2); not on X (Twitter)
- Matches Propelr: has all 2 features we verified for Propelr
5 of 13 tracked details verified
- Arcitext · #16, 79/100
AI-assisted writing app with chat-based edits, tone checks, rewrite suggestions, fact checking and content repurposing, priced by monthly credits.
- Score: 79/100, #16 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Entry price: $15 billed monthly (Starter), $4 less than Propelr's $19 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
- Free plan: no (Propelr: yes) source
- Verified features: AI assistant, Brand voice, SEO optimisation
5 of 13 tracked details verified
- Revise AI · #17, 79/100
AI editing tool that shows suggested changes as tracked edits to accept or reject, with custom style rules, document chat and a Chrome extension.
- Score: 79/100, #17 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Entry price: $16 billed monthly (Pro), $3 less than Propelr's $19 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
- Verified features: AI assistant, Brand voice, Browser extension
5 of 13 tracked details verified
- Scripti AI · #23, 76/100
Web tool that takes a rough video idea and produces a researched angle, script, titles and thumbnail brief for YouTube creators.
- Score: 76/100, #23 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Entry price: $19 billed monthly (Creator), the same as Propelr source
- Platforms: 1 platform (Propelr: 2); not on X (Twitter) and LinkedIn; adds YouTube
- Verified features: Team access, AI assistant
3 of 13 tracked details verified
- NeuronWriter · #24, 76/100
SEO content optimization platform that analyses search results to guide writing and monitors how brands appear in AI answers.
- Score: 76/100, #24 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Entry price: $23 billed monthly (Bronze), $4 more than Propelr's $19 source
- Free plan: no (Propelr: yes) source
- Verified features: Team access, Templates, AI assistant, SEO optimisation, Plagiarism checker and 1 more
7 of 13 tracked details verified
- AutoBlogWriter · #26, 72/100
Automates blog publishing for Next.js, React, Astro and WordPress sites by researching, writing and publishing posts with images, metadata and schema markup.
- Score: 72/100, #26 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Entry price: $19 billed monthly (Starter), the same as Propelr source
- Free plan: no (Propelr: yes) source
- Verified features: Analytics, Brand voice, SEO optimisation
4 of 13 tracked details verified
RedactAI · #48, 51/100
AI writing tool that drafts LinkedIn posts in the user's own voice from their profile and post history, with scheduling and statistics.
- Score: 51/100, #48 of 59 (Propelr: 76/100, #22)
- Entry price: $11.90 per month billed annually; not compared with Propelr, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
- Free plan: no (Propelr: yes) source
- Platforms: 1 platform (Propelr: 2); not on X (Twitter)
- Verified features: Analytics, Brand voice
3 of 13 tracked details verified
- Feedkraft
AI tool that learns a brand from a website URL, generates posts and carousels, and publishes them on a schedule to LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook.
- Score: not ranked (40% coverage)
- Platforms: 3 platforms (Propelr: 2); not on X (Twitter); adds Instagram and Facebook
- Verified features: AI assistant
2 of 13 tracked details verified
Propelr head to head
How we picked
- Pool: tools in the same market as the tool on this page: they list its primary category, and their own primary category is one it lists too. Explicit competitor links count as well.
- Closest first, at most 10: explicit competitors, then the same primary category, then more shared categories, then the smallest gap in entry price (per month, on a log scale), then more shared platforms, then name.
- Order on the page: tools ranked on the category scorecard by their category rank, then tools that are not ranked (no scorecard, or under 60% of the weight with verified data) in closeness order.
- Prices are compared only on the same billing basis (billed monthly with billed monthly, billed annually with billed annually). A feature counts as missing only when the vendor's page states it; a feature the vendor does not mention is not listed either way.
Every value is read from the vendor's own pages (or GitHub for licences and stars) and shown with the date we checked it. A value we could not verify is shown as a dash, never estimated, and never read as a “no”. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Methodology
The scorecard behind the ranks
Every one of these AI writing tools is scored by the same 7 criteria (scorecard v1). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to AI writing tools. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.
| Criterion | Weight | Type | What we measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | 25% | Core | Price per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other AI writing tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $9.99/month or less = 100, $69 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $4.92/month or less = 100, $49 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored. |
| Free plan or trial | 15% | Core | Whether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored. |
| Pricing transparency | 10% | Core | How much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored. |
| Verified features | 15% | Core | How many of the 8 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (analytics, team access, templates, ai assistant, brand voice, seo optimisation, plagiarism checker, browser extension). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 4 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored. |
| API, integrations and export | 10% | Core | Whether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored. |
| Cost per user (team of 3) | 15% | Category | Monthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Log scale: $13 per user or less = 100, $69 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored. |
| Languages | 10% | Category | Number of languages the vendor says it offers.Linear scale: 100 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored. |
Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.
Questions, answered from the data
Who are Propelr's main competitors?
By our scorecard, the highest-ranked of its closest competitors are Authormity (92/100), CannerAI (90/100) and LinkGenie (87/100).
Which Propelr competitor is cheapest?
Billed monthly, CannerAI starts lowest at $9 a month (Creator). Entry plans differ in limits.
How does Propelr rank against its competitors?
Propelr is #22 of 59 ranked AI writing tools with 76/100.
Which Propelr competitors have a free plan?
Authormity, CannerAI, LinkGenie, Revise AI and Scripti AI and 1 more.