Text to speech

Top Typecast competitors 10 competitors in Typecast's market

Competitors listed
10
Ranked on the scorecard
10
Typecast's rank
#6 of 41
With a free plan
7

Data checked Oct 14, 2026 against the vendors' own pages. How we verify

These are the 10 tools closest to Typecast in its own market: text to speech tools that list text to speech too, picked by shared categories and how close their entry price is to Typecast's (the rules are below).

10 of them are ranked on the text to speech tools scorecard; Uberduck is the highest at 100/100 (#1 of 41 in the category).

Typecast itself is #6 of 41 with 92/100, so 3 competitors on this list rank above it.

Typecast's cheapest paid plan is $5 per month billed annually (Basic). On the same billing basis, 1 of 6 competitors with a published price start lower and 4 start higher; entry plans are not like-for-like, so check the limits.

7 competitors have a free plan, and so does Typecast.

Typecast vs its competitors: market position

Typecast is the highlighted row. Rank is the position in the text to speech tools ranking.
Typecast and its competitors
RankToolScoreFrom, billed monthlyFrom, billed yearlyFree planPublic APIFeatures verifiedData checked
#6TypecastThis tool92/100Not offered$5/moYesYes3 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#1Uberduck100/100Not offered$2/moYesYes3 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#3Cartesia98/100$5/moNot offeredYesYes3 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#5ElevenLabs93/100$6/mo$5/moYes, 10,000 credits per monthYes5 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#7cboard92/100$8/mo$6.58/moYes––Oct 14, 2026
#8VocalLab AI92/100$9/mo$7.50/moYesYes5 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#10VideoDubber92/100$9/moNot offeredNo–4 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#15VoiceStudio84/100Not offered$8.25/user/moYes–2 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#22BritishAccent76/100$14.27/moNot offeredYes–1 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#30Audixa AI63/100$14/moNot offeredNoYes2 of 5Oct 14, 2026
#32Podcastify61/100$9.95/mo$8.58/moNo–2 of 5Oct 14, 2026

Each value links the page it was read from (hover for the check date).

– = not published by the vendor, or not verified yet.

How each competitor differs from Typecast

Computed from verified facts on both sides; a feature counts as missing only when the vendor states it.
  1. Uberduck · #1, 100/100

    AI vocals and text-to-speech service that generates speech, singing and rapping from text, with voice cloning, an API and AI music generation.

    • Score: 100/100, #1 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $2 per month billed annually (Starter), $3 less than Typecast's $5 source
    • Matches Typecast: has all 3 features we verified for Typecast

    4 of 10 tracked details verified

    Typecast vs UberduckUberduck reviewPricing

    Uberduck homepage (screenshot)
    Homepage captured Oct 14, 2026
  2. Cartesia · #3, 98/100

    Voice AI platform offering text-to-speech, speech-to-text and managed voice agents through one API, deployable in the cloud, on-premise or on-device.

    • Score: 98/100, #3 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $5 billed monthly; not compared with Typecast, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Matches Typecast: has all 3 features we verified for Typecast

    4 of 10 tracked details verified

    Typecast vs CartesiaCartesia reviewPricing

  3. ElevenLabs · #5, 93/100

    AI audio platform for generating speech, music, sound effects and dubbing, with a separate conversational agents platform and developer APIs.

    • Score: 93/100, #5 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $5 per month billed annually (Starter), the same as Typecast (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
    • Matches Typecast: has all 3 features we verified for Typecast

    8 of 10 tracked details verified

    Typecast vs ElevenLabsElevenLabs reviewPricing

  4. cboard · #7, 92/100

    Open-source communication board app that pairs symbols and text with spoken output for people with speech and language impairments.

    • Score: 92/100, #7 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $6.58 per month billed annually (Pro Yearly Plan), $1.58 more than Typecast's $5 source
    • In numbers: 3 published plans and a free plan. source

    3 of 10 tracked details verified

    cboard reviewPricing

  5. VocalLab AI · #8, 92/100

    AI text-to-speech platform with a voice library, voice cloning and design, video dubbing, audiobook tools, an API and an MCP server.

    • Score: 92/100, #8 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $7.50 per month billed annually (Lite), $2.50 more than Typecast's $5 source
    • Matches Typecast: has all 3 features we verified for Typecast

    7 of 10 tracked details verified

    Typecast vs VocalLab AIVocalLab AI reviewPricing

  6. VideoDubber · #10, 92/100

    AI video dubbing and translation service that clones voices, syncs lips and exports subtitles or dubbed video, available through plans and a REST API.

    • Score: 92/100, #10 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $9 billed monthly; not compared with Typecast, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Free plan: no (Typecast: yes) source
    • Verified features: Voice cloning, Text-to-speech API, AI dubbing / translation, Team access

    7 of 10 tracked details verified

    Typecast vs VideoDubberVideoDubber reviewPricing

  7. VoiceStudio · #15, 84/100

    Open-source desktop application for local voice cloning, voice design, video dubbing, dictation, transcription and audiobook creation.

    • Score: 84/100, #15 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $8.25 per user per month billed annually (Pro), $3.25 more than Typecast's $5 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
    • Verified features: Voice cloning, AI dubbing / translation

    4 of 10 tracked details verified

    VoiceStudio reviewPricing

  8. BritishAccent · #22, 76/100

    British English text-to-speech service with a library of regional UK voices, plus voice cloning, transcription and lip sync, sold through credits.

    • Score: 76/100, #22 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $14.27 billed monthly; not compared with Typecast, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Verified features: Voice cloning

    3 of 10 tracked details verified

    BritishAccent reviewPricing

  9. Audixa AI · #30, 63/100

    Text-to-speech service with a multilingual voice library, voice cloning and a REST API, billed by usage balance.

    • Score: 63/100, #30 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $14 billed monthly; not compared with Typecast, which publishes no price on the same billing basis source
    • Free plan: no (Typecast: yes) source
    • Verified features: Voice cloning, Text-to-speech API

    3 of 10 tracked details verified

    Audixa AI reviewPricing

  10. Podcastify · #32, 61/100

    AI service that turns text, PDFs, web pages and images into two-host podcast episodes with selectable or cloned voices and editable transcripts.

    • Score: 61/100, #32 of 41 (Typecast: 92/100, #6)
    • Entry price: $8.58 per month billed annually (Hobby), $3.58 more than Typecast's $5 (different pricing units: compare plan limits) source
    • Free plan: no (Typecast: yes) source
    • Verified features: Voice cloning, Commercial use on paid plans

    6 of 10 tracked details verified

    Podcastify reviewPricing

Typecast head to head

How we picked

  1. Pool: tools in the same market as the tool on this page: they list its primary category, and their own primary category is one it lists too. Explicit competitor links count as well.
  2. Closest first, at most 10: explicit competitors, then the same primary category, then more shared categories, then the smallest gap in entry price (per month, on a log scale), then more shared platforms, then name.
  3. Order on the page: tools ranked on the category scorecard by their category rank, then tools that are not ranked (no scorecard, or under 60% of the weight with verified data) in closeness order.
  4. Prices are compared only on the same billing basis (billed monthly with billed monthly, billed annually with billed annually). A feature counts as missing only when the vendor's page states it; a feature the vendor does not mention is not listed either way.

Every value is read from the vendor's own pages (or GitHub for licences and stars) and shown with the date we checked it. A value we could not verify is shown as a dash, never estimated, and never read as a “no”. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Methodology

The scorecard behind the ranks

Every one of these text to speech tools is scored by the same 8 criteria (scorecard v1). Each criterion gives 0 to 100 from the vendor's published data; the total is the weighted average. A criterion without verified data is left out and the other weights are re-normalised. A tool with under 60% of the weight covered is listed as not ranked, and so is a tool with no verified price and fewer than 2 verified features (“needs a verified price”); each score shows how many criteria it is based on. The core criteria are the same in every category; the category criteria are specific to text to speech tools. Nobody gets custom weights, including our own products.

Scorecard criteria and weights
CriterionWeightTypeWhat we measure
Entry price25%CorePrice per month of the cheapest paid plan, against the prices of other text to speech tools on the same billing basis (monthly-billed prices against monthly, annual-billed against annual).Log scale. Billed monthly: $8/month or less = 100, $99 or more = 0. Only billed annually: $5/month or less = 100, $28 or more = 0. Only free plans = 100. Usage-priced and one-time plans are not scored.
Free plan or trial15%CoreWhether you can use the tool before paying: a free plan, or failing that a free trial, as shown on the vendor's pricing page.Free plan = 100. No free plan but a free trial = 60. The pricing page lists plans but shows neither = 0. No plans read = not scored.
Pricing transparency10%CoreHow much of the pricing is public: the share of plans with a published price ("contact sales" counts against), and whether there are at least 3 published tiers.80 x (plans with a public price / plans listed) + 20 x (public plans, up to 3) / 3. No plans read = not scored.
Verified features15%CoreHow many of the 5 features we track for this category the vendor's own pages verifiably show (voice cloning, commercial use on paid plans, text-to-speech api, ai dubbing / translation, team access). This counts verified features only: a tool that documents less scores lower here, and only here.Linear: verified features / 3 (half the tracked list) x 100, capped at 100. No tracked feature verified = not scored.
API, integrations and export10%CoreWhether a public API exists, how many integrations the vendor states, and whether the vendor documents a way to export your data.Average of the parts with data: public API yes = 100, no = 0; integrations on a log scale (100 or more = 100); a documented data export = 100. None verified = not scored.
Languages10%CategoryNumber of languages the vendor says it offers.Linear scale: 100 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored.
Voice library10%CategoryNumber of stock voices the vendor says it offers.Log scale: 1,000 or more = 100. No stated count = not scored.
Cost per user (team of 3)5%CategoryMonthly price per user for a team of 3, on the cheapest paid plan that is priced per seat or states room for at least 3 users.Log scale: $8.25 per user or less = 100, $99.67 or more = 0. Plans that do not state a user limit are not used. No such plan = not scored.

Sources are vendor pricing pages, docs and changelogs, each with the date we checked it. We did not test these tools hands-on unless a listing says so. Full formulas: methodology.

Questions, answered from the data

Who are Typecast's main competitors?

By our scorecard, the highest-ranked of its closest competitors are Uberduck (100/100), Cartesia (98/100) and ElevenLabs (93/100).

Which Typecast competitor is cheapest?

Billed monthly, Cartesia starts lowest at $5 a month (Pro). Entry plans differ in limits.

How does Typecast rank against its competitors?

Typecast is #6 of 41 ranked text to speech tools with 92/100.

Which Typecast competitors have a free plan?

Uberduck, Cartesia, ElevenLabs, cboard and VocalLab AI and 2 more.